Ethereum Name Service (ENS)
Ethereum's .eth naming protocol: NFT-owned names with per-year, length-tiered pricing and broad wallet/browser resolution.
A genuinely decentralised, extremely cheap and censorship-resistant registry for .bit names with no company and no recurring fee, but it demands technical setup (wallet, manual name ops, ncdns/TLS), names expire without renewal, and its security and liquidity depend on the Bitcoin ecosystem and thin NMC markets.
site reachable · checked 11 h ago · daily check
by the bestcloudmining editorial desk · curated review · prose updated 2026-10-02 · facts as of 2026-10-02 · how we verify
Namecoin is a decentralized naming/identity service from our database records on 2026-10-02 [1]. The original .bit naming chain (2011): on-chain names for a 0.01 NMC fee plus transaction fee, merge-mined with Bitcoin. The operator is Namecoin project (not disclosed) [2]. A genuinely decentralised, extremely cheap and censorship-resistant registry for .bit names with no company and no recurring fee, but it demands technical setup (wallet, manual name ops, ncdns/TLS), names expire without renewal, and its security and liquidity depend on the Bitcoin ecosystem and thin NMC markets. [3]. This review was fact-checked against live sources on 2026-10-02 [1].
The original .bit naming chain (2011): on-chain names for a 0.01 NMC fee plus transaction fee, merge-mined with Bitcoin. The specific products available depend on the current service configuration [2]. Pricing is not publicly documented [3]. See the Pricing section below for rates and the Contract section for terms.
The operator is Namecoin project, based in not disclosed [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. Terms of service were reviewed on our check date [1]. No refund policy was documented beyond standard provider terms [3]. Payment methods and pricing are documented in the Pricing section [3].
The service was live and responding on 2026-10-02 [1]. The documentation was accessible and reviewed [2]. Key claims were verified against the operator's own published information [3]. What stays unverifiable depends on the depth of public documentation available from this provider [3].
No critical issues were found during our verification pass [1]. Community feedback was checked for complaints and positive signals [3]. No fraud, exit or insolvency events were identified during our check [3]. The service status was live and operational on our check date [1].
Pricing is not publicly documented [3]. Payment methods and fees are documented per the operator's published pricing [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. No minimum deposit or purchase threshold beyond standard account creation [3] [4] [5].
| Documented price | see provider site |
|---|---|
| Notes | The registration fee is 0.01 NMC and is destroyed by the transaction ('nobody gets them'); the transaction fee is dynamic and set by miners. There is no registration fee for renewals or updates, only a transaction fee. At NMC ~$1.02 (2026-09-24) the 0.01 NMC fee is about one US cent. Registration uses a commit-then-reveal flow (pre-registration of a salted hash) with a mandatory 12-block minimum delay. Names semi-expire after 31,968 blocks (~222 days) without renewal/update and fully expire after an additional 4,032 blocks (~28 days), after which anyone can re-register. Name values are limited to 520 bytes. A variable USD figure is not recorded because the real cost is the dynamic transaction fee. |
Run the long math before paying: cloud mining calculator →
Built only from what is documented on this page as of 2026-10-02 - anything not documented stays a gap on purpose.
Everything happens on namecoin.org - we count the click, nothing else changes for you.
KYC is documented as none as of 2026-10-02. Create the account with an email only; assume a check can still be requested before a large payout.
Accepted: NMC. Check the network and the deposit address inside your account, never from an email.
250-day contract · refund: No refunds; on-chain name operations are irreversible, and an expired name can be re-registered by anyone. A term you did not read is money you cannot get back.
Proof is documented as yes - Names, values and expiry are on-chain Namecoin consensus state; the chain is open source and its proof of work is merge-mined with Bitcoin (AuxPoW). Compare the first payout with the pool or wallet before scaling up.
Then run the math: mining calculator · contract vs. HODL · all web3 names providers.
Short answer: Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Namecoin scores 6.8/10 in our weighted review. We logged no red flags. User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
| Status | active |
|---|---|
| Operator | Namecoin project (high) |
| Founded | 2011 |
| Proof | published |
| KYC | none |
No red flags logged as of 2026-10-02.
A real, operating provider can still lose you money: with a contract you own no hardware, revenue follows coin price and difficulty, and most published contracts are priced so the seller comes out ahead. "Legit" means the operator exists and pays what its terms promise - not that the deal is profitable. 15 dated sources back this page; they are listed under sources.
Same category, scored on the same criteria - so the comparison stays honest. Compare only in the same unit, and read the minimum, KYC and proof columns before switching.
Ethereum's .eth naming protocol: NFT-owned names with per-year, length-tiered pricing and broad wallet/browser resolution.
Bitcoin Name System on Stacks: .btc names as SIP-09 NFTs, flat 2 STX burn for a ~5-year term, anchored to Bitcoin.
ENS subnames on Base: length-tiered annual .base.eth rents in ETH, one free qualifying name, wallet-dependent resolution.
Aptos Labs-operated .apt names: length-tiered annual rents in APT, 30-day grace period, operator can revoke names.
Ready to try Namecoin? Start small, verify one payout, and only scale up once the hashrate or compute actually matches what you paid for.
Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Namecoin scores 6.8/10 in our weighted review. We logged no red flags. User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.