Ethereum Name Service (ENS)
Ethereum's .eth naming protocol: NFT-owned names with per-year, length-tiered pricing and broad wallet/browser resolution.
A genuinely cheap, Bitcoin-anchored naming system (flat 2 STX burn for ~5 years) with on-chain verifiable rules, but no operating entity, a burn model you can never recover, and a ~5-year expiry rather than true permanence.
site reachable · checked 11 h ago · daily check
by the bestcloudmining editorial desk · curated review · prose updated 2026-10-02 · facts as of 2026-10-02 · how we verify
Stacks BNS (.btc names) is a decentralized naming/identity service from our database records on 2026-10-02 [1]. Bitcoin Name System on Stacks: .btc names as SIP-09 NFTs, flat 2 STX burn for a ~5-year term, anchored to Bitcoin. The operator is Bitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub (not disclosed) [2]. A genuinely cheap, Bitcoin-anchored naming system (flat 2 STX burn for ~5 years) with on-chain verifiable rules, but no operating entity, a burn model you can never recover, and a ~5-year expiry rather than true permanence. [3]. This review was fact-checked against live sources on 2026-10-02 [1].
Bitcoin Name System on Stacks: .btc names as SIP-09 NFTs, flat 2 STX burn for a ~5-year term, anchored to Bitcoin. The specific products available depend on the current service configuration [2]. From $0.62 per registration (~5-year term) [3]. See the Pricing section below for rates and the Contract section for terms.
The operator is Bitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub, based in not disclosed [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. Terms of service were reviewed on our check date [1]. No refund policy was documented beyond standard provider terms [3]. Payment methods and pricing are documented in the Pricing section [3].
The service was live and responding on 2026-10-02 [1]. The documentation was accessible and reviewed [2]. Key claims were verified against the operator's own published information [3]. What stays unverifiable depends on the depth of public documentation available from this provider [3].
No critical issues were found during our verification pass [1]. Community feedback was checked for complaints and positive signals [3]. No fraud, exit or insolvency events were identified during our check [3]. The service status was live and operational on our check date [1].
From $0.62 per registration (~5-year term) [3]. Payment methods and fees are documented per the operator's published pricing [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. No minimum deposit or purchase threshold beyond standard account creation [3] [4] [5].
| Documented price | $0.620 per registration (~5-year term) · $0.620 per renewal (~5 years, same flat 2 STX) |
|---|---|
| Minimum | $0.620 |
| Notes | Observed on-chain 2026-09-24 by calling BNS-V2 (`SP2QEZ06AGJ3RKJPBV14SY1V5BBFNAW33D96YPGZF.BNS-V2`) get-name-price for the .btc namespace: a FLAT 2,000,000 microSTX = 2 STX for every name length tested (1-30 chars). The price function has base=1000, coeff=200 and all 16 buckets=1. STX is BURNED (destroyed), not paid to an operator. At STX $0.311717 (2026-09-24) that is ~$0.62. The .btc namespace lifetime is 262,800 burn blocks (~5 years) and renewal burns the same price and extends by another lifetime. The .btc namespace itself costs 4,000,000,000 microSTX = 4,000 STX to register/renew. bnsv2.com markets 'dynamic pricing based on name length' but the current .btc price function is flat. |
Run the long math before paying: cloud mining calculator →
Built only from what is documented on this page as of 2026-10-02 - anything not documented stays a gap on purpose.
Everything happens on stacks.co - we count the click, nothing else changes for you.
KYC is documented as none as of 2026-10-02. Create the account with an email only; assume a check can still be requested before a large payout.
Price from $0.620 per registration, minimum $0.620 - start with the minimum, not with the plan the checkout page pushes.
Accepted: STX. Check the network and the deposit address inside your account, never from an email.
1825-day contract · maintenance · refund: No refunds; registration/renewal STX is burned and irreversible. A term you did not read is money you cannot get back.
Proof is documented as yes - Names are SIP-09 NFTs on the BNS-V2 contract; ownership, expiry and pricing are on-chain and resolution is deterministic without central servers. Compare the first payout with the pool or wallet before scaling up.
Then run the math: mining calculator · contract vs. HODL · all web3 names providers.
Short answer: Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Stacks BNS (.btc names) scores 7.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged 2 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
| Status | active |
|---|---|
| Operator | Bitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub · HQ Stacks / Bitcoin ecosystem (low) |
| Founded | 2020 |
| Proof | published |
| KYC | none |
A real, operating provider can still lose you money: with a contract you own no hardware, revenue follows coin price and difficulty, and most published contracts are priced so the seller comes out ahead. "Legit" means the operator exists and pays what its terms promise - not that the deal is profitable. 14 dated sources back this page; they are listed under sources.
Same category, scored on the same criteria - so the comparison stays honest. Compare only in the same unit, and read the minimum, KYC and proof columns before switching.
Ethereum's .eth naming protocol: NFT-owned names with per-year, length-tiered pricing and broad wallet/browser resolution.
ENS subnames on Base: length-tiered annual .base.eth rents in ETH, one free qualifying name, wallet-dependent resolution.
Aptos Labs-operated .apt names: length-tiered annual rents in APT, 30-day grace period, operator can revoke names.
.sui names on Sui: length-tiered annual subscriptions (USD base, payable in NS/SUI/USDC) governed by the SuiNS DAO.
Ready to try Stacks BNS (.btc names)? Start small, verify one payout, and only scale up once the hashrate or compute actually matches what you paid for.
Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Stacks BNS (.btc names) scores 7.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged 2 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.
No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.