7.9
our score no user ratings yet - be the first

Stacks BNS (.btc names) Review: fees, KYC and how to sign up

A genuinely cheap, Bitcoin-anchored naming system (flat 2 STX burn for ~5 years) with on-chain verifiable rules, but no operating entity, a burn model you can never recover, and a ~5-year expiry rather than true permanence.

no KYC provable2 red flags
Visit Stacks BNS (.btc names) visit link may be affiliated Read full review

site reachable · checked 11 h ago · daily check

Red flags (2):
  • No legal entity identified for the BNS Hub front end
  • Critical community position that Bitcoin-domain registration is a first-mover race that harms wallet-name UX

// Review

by the bestcloudmining editorial desk · curated review · prose updated 2026-10-02 · facts as of 2026-10-02 · how we verify

Overview

Stacks BNS (.btc names) is a decentralized naming/identity service from our database records on 2026-10-02 [1]. Bitcoin Name System on Stacks: .btc names as SIP-09 NFTs, flat 2 STX burn for a ~5-year term, anchored to Bitcoin. The operator is Bitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub (not disclosed) [2]. A genuinely cheap, Bitcoin-anchored naming system (flat 2 STX burn for ~5 years) with on-chain verifiable rules, but no operating entity, a burn model you can never recover, and a ~5-year expiry rather than true permanence. [3]. This review was fact-checked against live sources on 2026-10-02 [1].

What you can rent

Bitcoin Name System on Stacks: .btc names as SIP-09 NFTs, flat 2 STX burn for a ~5-year term, anchored to Bitcoin. The specific products available depend on the current service configuration [2]. From $0.62 per registration (~5-year term) [3]. See the Pricing section below for rates and the Contract section for terms.

Contract & terms

The operator is Bitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub, based in not disclosed [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. Terms of service were reviewed on our check date [1]. No refund policy was documented beyond standard provider terms [3]. Payment methods and pricing are documented in the Pricing section [3].

Proof & verifiability

The service was live and responding on 2026-10-02 [1]. The documentation was accessible and reviewed [2]. Key claims were verified against the operator's own published information [3]. What stays unverifiable depends on the depth of public documentation available from this provider [3].

Reliability & history

No critical issues were found during our verification pass [1]. Community feedback was checked for complaints and positive signals [3]. No fraud, exit or insolvency events were identified during our check [3]. The service status was live and operational on our check date [1].

Pricing

From $0.62 per registration (~5-year term) [3]. Payment methods and fees are documented per the operator's published pricing [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. No minimum deposit or purchase threshold beyond standard account creation [3] [4] [5].

++ What works

  • Very cheap flat price: 2 STX (~$0.62) for a ~5-year term
  • SIP-09 NFT names, freely transferable/listed on the native marketplace
  • Anchored to Bitcoin via Stacks; deterministic resolution
  • Open contract and official Stacks documentation; pricing verifiable on-chain
  • Long history (Namecoin 2014, Stacks era 2021, BNSv2 2024) with a real migration

-- What to watch

  • ~5-year expiry with a 34-day grace; not permanent ownership
  • Registration fee is BURNED STX, never recoverable
  • Marketing says dynamic length pricing, but .btc is currently flat
  • One-step registration can be sniped in the mempool per project docs
  • No named operator entity to hold accountable
  • BNS v1 and v2 are separate, which can confuse resolution/history

Pricing reality check

Documented price$0.620 per registration (~5-year term) · $0.620 per renewal (~5 years, same flat 2 STX)
Minimum$0.620
NotesObserved on-chain 2026-09-24 by calling BNS-V2 (`SP2QEZ06AGJ3RKJPBV14SY1V5BBFNAW33D96YPGZF.BNS-V2`) get-name-price for the .btc namespace: a FLAT 2,000,000 microSTX = 2 STX for every name length tested (1-30 chars). The price function has base=1000, coeff=200 and all 16 buckets=1. STX is BURNED (destroyed), not paid to an operator. At STX $0.311717 (2026-09-24) that is ~$0.62. The .btc namespace lifetime is 262,800 burn blocks (~5 years) and renewal burns the same price and extends by another lifetime. The .btc namespace itself costs 4,000,000,000 microSTX = 4,000 STX to register/renew. bnsv2.com markets 'dynamic pricing based on name length' but the current .btc price function is flat.

Run the long math before paying: cloud mining calculator →

// How to get started with Stacks BNS

Built only from what is documented on this page as of 2026-10-02 - anything not documented stays a gap on purpose.

  1. Open the provider site

    Everything happens on stacks.co - we count the click, nothing else changes for you.

  2. No ID check documented

    KYC is documented as none as of 2026-10-02. Create the account with an email only; assume a check can still be requested before a large payout.

  3. Pick the smallest unit that still works

    Price from $0.620 per registration, minimum $0.620 - start with the minimum, not with the plan the checkout page pushes.

  4. Pay

    Accepted: STX. Check the network and the deposit address inside your account, never from an email.

  5. Read the term before you sign

    1825-day contract · maintenance · refund: No refunds; registration/renewal STX is burned and irreversible. A term you did not read is money you cannot get back.

  6. Verify the output, not the dashboard

    Proof is documented as yes - Names are SIP-09 NFTs on the BNS-V2 contract; ownership, expiry and pricing are on-chain and resolution is deterministic without central servers. Compare the first payout with the pool or wallet before scaling up.

Then run the math: mining calculator · contract vs. HODL · all web3 names providers.

// Is Stacks BNS (.btc names) legit?

Short answer: Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Stacks BNS (.btc names) scores 7.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged 2 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.

Statusactive
OperatorBitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub · HQ Stacks / Bitcoin ecosystem (low)
Founded2020
Proofpublished
KYCnone

Red flags

  • No legal entity identified for the BNS Hub front end
  • Critical community position that Bitcoin-domain registration is a first-mover race that harms wallet-name UX

What "legit" does not mean

A real, operating provider can still lose you money: with a contract you own no hardware, revenue follows coin price and difficulty, and most published contracts are priced so the seller comes out ahead. "Legit" means the operator exists and pays what its terms promise - not that the deal is profitable. 14 dated sources back this page; they are listed under sources.

// Alternatives to Stacks BNS (.btc names)

Same category, scored on the same criteria - so the comparison stays honest. Compare only in the same unit, and read the minimum, KYC and proof columns before switching.

#1

Ethereum Name Service (ENS)

Ethereum's .eth naming protocol: NFT-owned names with per-year, length-tiered pricing and broad wallet/browser resolution.

7.9
no KYC provable open source self-custody
from $5 per year min $5
Web3 naming naming registry 46 d ago
#2

Basenames (Base)

ENS subnames on Base: length-tiered annual .base.eth rents in ETH, one free qualifying name, wallet-dependent resolution.

7.5
no KYC provable
from $0.270 per year
Web3 naming naming registry 46 d ago
#3

Aptos Names

Aptos Labs-operated .apt names: length-tiered annual rents in APT, 30-day grace period, operator can revoke names.

7.2
no KYC provable
from $0.820 per year min $0.820
Web3 naming naming registry 46 d ago
#4

Sui Name Service (SuiNS)

.sui names on Sui: length-tiered annual subscriptions (USD base, payable in NS/SUI/USDC) governed by the SuiNS DAO.

7.2
no KYC provable
from $10 per year min $5
Web3 naming naming registry 46 d ago

Ready to try Stacks BNS (.btc names)? Start small, verify one payout, and only scale up once the hashrate or compute actually matches what you paid for.

Visit Stacks BNS (.btc names) or compare all providers →

// Stacks BNS (.btc names) FAQ

Is Stacks BNS (.btc names) legit?

Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Stacks BNS (.btc names) scores 7.9/10 in our weighted review. We logged 2 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.

// The meta-review: what the internet says about Stacks BNS (.btc names)

We do not expect you to trust us. This review is a meta-review: below you see what other review sites claim, what users report on Reddit, forums and complaint boards, and who actually operates Stacks BNS (.btc names). Every claim links to its source so you can verify it yourself. Our verdict forms from these sources plus our own fact checks - not the other way around.

// What other reviewers say (0)

Heads-up: most cloud mining "reviews" are affiliate content. We mark our reliability judgement on every source and include critical voices deliberately.

No third-party reviews with usable evidence found yet. In this niche that is itself a signal - most "review" sites are paid placements.

// What users say (3)

Reddit, forums, complaint boards. Anecdotes, not proof - but payout complaints and host-reliability patterns are the best early-warning system this market has.

reddit.com

Community discussion

Community discussion was checked for complaints and feedback on our check date.

source dated n.d. · verified by us 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200 · known site, treat as indicative
reddit.com/r/Domains mixed

Merging Web2 and Web3 Domains: .btc domains a good investment?

Community debate about .btc domains as an investment at the intersection of Web2 and Web3, reflecting the speculative angle of BNS names. Reddit 403 to this host; retrieved via pullpush.io.

source dated 2024-02-18 · verified by us 2026-09-24 · HTTP 403 · unverified / anonymous source
reddit.com/r/BitcoinOrdinals negative

.sat .btc .ord etc domain name registration is a scam.

Critical community argument that the current implementations of Bitcoin DNS are a hasty race for firsties that will hurt the community's ability to send Bitcoin to one another, undermining the real goal of wallet/name resolution. Reddit 403 to this host; retrieved via pullpush.io.

source dated 2023-03-04 · verified by us 2026-09-24 · HTTP 403 · unverified / anonymous source

// Who is behind Stacks BNS (.btc names)?

Cloud mining ownership is often deliberately opaque. This is what we could verify - with sources. Confidence: unknown ownership (checked 2026-09-24).

OperatorBitcoin Name System (BNS) / BNS Hub
Legal entityBNS (community/ecosystem project on Stacks)

Other sites run by the same operator/network:

  • BNS
  • BNSv2
  • .btc
  • BNS Hub

BNS is a protocol/community project on Stacks, not a company; no legal entity is named on the fetched pages, and the bnsv2.com GitHub link (github.com/BNSHub) currently returns 404. The primary v2 contract is SP2QEZ06AGJ3RKJPBV14SY1V5BBFNAW33D96YPGZF.BNS-V2. Namespaces can be unmanaged (permissionless, STX-burn pricing) or managed (a manager principal controls pricing/lifecycle).

// AI fact summary - everything we know, compressed

Generated by Qwen3 on 2026-09-28 from our fact database plus the 14 linked sources above. It summarizes - it does not add facts. Check anything that matters against the linked sources.

Bottom line: Stacks BNS (.btc names) is an active, Bitcoin-anchored naming system where registration and renewal each burn 2 STX (~$0.62 at current price) for a ~5-year term. The system is on-chain, irreversible, and requires no KYC, but you cannot recover the burned STX and must re-burn to renew. It offers verifiable, decentralized name ownership but not permanent registration.

The coverage truth: .btc names resolve to addresses via the Stacks ecosystem and are designed for identity use in Web3, not for unblocking streaming or geo-restricted services. This is a naming protocol, not a Smart DNS or VPN service.

Setup reality: Registration requires a Stacks-compatible wallet and interaction with the BNS Hub interface or direct contract calls. No apps or IP registration; setup is blockchain-based through preorder/reveal mechanics or instant registration with mempool risk.

What reviewers say vs what users say: Official docs and operator sites present BNS as a legitimate identity layer on Bitcoin via Stacks, with transparent on-chain mechanics. Community sentiment is split: some see value in decentralized identity, while others call Bitcoin-domain registration a speculative race that harms usability and community trust.

Who runs it: BNS is a community/ecosystem protocol on Stacks, not a company; the front end (BNS Hub) has no identified legal entity. It is associated with the Stacks ecosystem and operated as a decentralized protocol using the BNS-V2 smart contract.

// Sources & how this review was built

Every external source used on this page, with the date we fetched it. Methodology: how we verify. Sources disappear or change - if a link is dead, tell us via contact.

  1. [1] operator stacks.co - Stacks BNS (.btc names) official site accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Stacks BNS (.btc names) was live and serving content on our verification date.”

  2. [2] operator docs.stacks.co - Stacks BNS (.btc names) documentation accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Documentation was accessible and reviewed for product details on our check date.”

  3. [3] operator stacks.co - Stacks BNS (.btc names) pricing or product page accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Pricing information was available on the provider product page.”

  4. [4] community www.reddit.com - Community discussion accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Community discussion was checked for complaints and feedback on our check date.”

  5. [5] operator stacks.co - Stacks BNS (.btc names) terms of service accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Terms of service were accessible and reviewed for key provisions.”

Initial database sources (pre meta-review):

// Rate Stacks BNS (.btc names)

Community score: no ratings yet

One rating per user and provider. Smoothed display (statistical prior) prevents single-vote manipulation.

// User comments (0)

No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.