6.8
our score no user ratings yet - be the first

Filebase Review: fees, KYC and how to sign up

A mature, well-backed S3-compatible store with genuinely free object egress and a real free tier, but the 'decentralized' pitch is now mostly IPFS pinning on Filebase-controlled infrastructure, Filecoin deals are no longer advertised, and no durability nines or standard SLA are published.

Visit Filebase visit link may be affiliated Read full review

site reachable · checked 11 h ago · daily check

Red flags (3):
  • Storage Terms: unpaid/depleted funding removes data within 30 days
  • Company disclaims all responsibility for the distributed storage platform and Storage Nodes
  • Marketing leans 'decentralized' while the Filecoin side is no longer documented on the site

// Review

by the bestcloudmining editorial desk · curated review · prose updated 2026-10-02 · facts as of 2026-10-02 · how we verify

Overview

Filebase is a decentralized storage service from our database records on 2026-10-02 [1]. S3-compatible object storage plus IPFS pinning with free object egress; $15/TB, free 5 GB tier (2026-09-24). The operator is Filebase (United States) [2]. A mature, well-backed S3-compatible store with genuinely free object egress and a real free tier, but the 'decentralized' pitch is now mostly IPFS pinning on Filebase-controlled infrastructure, Filecoin deals are no longer advertised, and no durability nines or standard SLA are published. [3]. This review was fact-checked against live sources on 2026-10-02 [1].

What you can rent

S3-compatible object storage plus IPFS pinning with free object egress; $15/TB, free 5 GB tier (2026-09-24). The specific products available depend on the current service configuration [2]. From $15.0 per TB/mo [3]. See the Pricing section below for rates and the Contract section for terms.

Contract & terms

The operator is Filebase, based in United States [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. Terms of service were reviewed on our check date [1]. No refund policy was documented beyond standard provider terms [3]. Payment methods and pricing are documented in the Pricing section [3].

Proof & verifiability

The service was live and responding on 2026-10-02 [1]. The documentation was accessible and reviewed [2]. Key claims were verified against the operator's own published information [3]. What stays unverifiable depends on the depth of public documentation available from this provider [3].

Reliability & history

No critical issues were found during our verification pass [1]. Community feedback was checked for complaints and positive signals [3]. No fraud, exit or insolvency events were identified during our check [3]. The service status was live and operational on our check date [1].

Pricing

From $15.0 per TB/mo [3]. Payment methods and fees are documented per the operator's published pricing [2]. KYC policy: none [3]. No minimum deposit or purchase threshold beyond standard account creation [3] [4] [5].

++ What works

  • Drop-in S3 API (endpoint s3.filebase.io, SigV4, region 'auto') with AWS SDK/CLI support
  • Free object egress and a free 5 GB tier; paid entry is only $7.50/month
  • Flat, predictable $15/TB object-storage rate with no egress penalty
  • IPFS pinning, IPNS names, gateways, sites and an object-storage product under one account
  • Operating since 2019, 6+ years, 2B+ objects and 60,000+ developers claimed, backed by Protocol Labs/Multicoin/Version One
  • Encryption at rest and TLS in transit by default; private buckets with scoped keys and pre-signed URLs

-- What to watch

  • No durability nines published and the uptime SLA is Enterprise-only
  • Filecoin storage deals (the original 'decentralized' selling point) are no longer advertised; current product is largely Filebase/Its-own IPFS infrastructure
  • The Storage Terms describe a distributed platform of third-party Storage Nodes that Filebase does not operate and disclaims liability for
  • Pricing model changed sharply in 2026 (old IPFS tiers $20/800 GB and $100/4 TB replaced by a $15/TB object-storage rate), so historical comparisons are misleading
  • IPFS egress is capped (250 GB on Pro) and then billed; only object egress is free
  • No crypto payment documented; card/fiat only

Pricing reality check

Documented price$15 per TB/mo · $0.015 per GB/mo additional storage/IPFS bandwidth
NotesObject storage list rate of $15/TB/month (i.e. $0.015/GB/month), free 5 GB tier. Paid self-serve entry plan is Pro at $7.50/month for 500 GB shared across object storage and IPFS; additional storage/IPFS bandwidth $0.015/GB; object egress free; IPFS egress 250 GB on Pro then $0.015/GB. Extra operations: $4.50/million Class A, $0.36/million Class B. Enterprise (volume, SLA, Slack, audit support) is quote-only. Observed on the official pricing page 2026-09-24; the Object Storage product launched 2026-05-20 with the same $15/TB figure. Older IPFS tier pricing (Starter $20/800 GB, Pro $100/4 TB) was observed in a 2025-09-06 Wayback snapshot, so this is a recent model change, not a long-standing list price.

Run the long math before paying: cloud mining calculator →

// How to get started with Filebase

Built only from what is documented on this page as of 2026-10-02 - anything not documented stays a gap on purpose.

  1. Open the provider site

    Everything happens on filebase.com - we count the click, nothing else changes for you.

  2. No ID check documented

    KYC is documented as none as of 2026-10-02. Create the account with an email only; assume a check can still be requested before a large payout.

  3. Pick the smallest unit that still works

    Price from $15 per TB/mo - start with the minimum, not with the plan the checkout page pushes.

  4. Read the term before you sign

    refund: Monthly plans are billed monthly and cancellable anytime (pricing page: 'Billed monthly, cancel anytime'). A term you did not read is money you cannot get back.

  5. Verify the output, not the dashboard

    Proof is documented as partial - IPFS objects are content-addressed (CIDs), so integrity is verifiable on retrieval, and the object-storage copy returns CIDs. Compare the first payout with the pool or wallet before scaling up.

Then run the math: mining calculator · contract vs. HODL · all decentralized storage providers.

// Is Filebase legit?

Short answer: Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Filebase scores 6.8/10 in our weighted review. We logged 3 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.

Statusactive
OperatorFilebase · HQ United States (high)
Founded2019
Proofpartial
KYCnone

Red flags

  • Storage Terms: unpaid/depleted funding removes data within 30 days
  • Company disclaims all responsibility for the distributed storage platform and Storage Nodes
  • Marketing leans 'decentralized' while the Filecoin side is no longer documented on the site

What "legit" does not mean

A real, operating provider can still lose you money: with a contract you own no hardware, revenue follows coin price and difficulty, and most published contracts are priced so the seller comes out ahead. "Legit" means the operator exists and pays what its terms promise - not that the deal is profitable. 15 dated sources back this page; they are listed under sources.

// Alternatives to Filebase

Same category, scored on the same criteria - so the comparison stays honest. Compare only in the same unit, and read the minimum, KYC and proof columns before switching.

#3

AWS S3 (legacy cloud benchmark)

Centralised hyperscaler object storage: 11-nines durability design and a 99.9% SLA, but ~$23/TB plus $0.09/GB egress and fiat-only payment.

7.4
from $23.55 per TB/mo
Decentralized storage S3-compatible storage 46 d ago
#4

Filecoin

Marketplace of independent storage providers proved by PoRep/PoSt; new Filecoin Onchain Cloud publishes a ~$5/TiB/mo managed warm-storage price.

7.3
no KYC provable
from $2.50 per TiB/mo per copy
Decentralized storage Filecoin storage provider 46 d ago

Ready to try Filebase? Start small, verify one payout, and only scale up once the hashrate or compute actually matches what you paid for.

Visit Filebase or compare all providers →

// Filebase FAQ

Is Filebase legit?

Based on our checks as of 2026-10-02: Filebase scores 6.8/10 in our weighted review. We logged 3 red flags (listed above). User reports and operator background are documented with dated sources in the meta-review below.

// The meta-review: what the internet says about Filebase

We do not expect you to trust us. This review is a meta-review: below you see what other review sites claim, what users report on Reddit, forums and complaint boards, and who actually operates Filebase. Every claim links to its source so you can verify it yourself. Our verdict forms from these sources plus our own fact checks - not the other way around.

// What other reviewers say (0)

Heads-up: most cloud mining "reviews" are affiliate content. We mark our reliability judgement on every source and include critical voices deliberately.

No third-party reviews with usable evidence found yet. In this niche that is itself a signal - most "review" sites are paid placements.

// What users say (4)

Reddit, forums, complaint boards. Anecdotes, not proof - but payout complaints and host-reliability patterns are the best early-warning system this market has.

reddit.com/r/hetzner positive

Hetzner S3 is completely down - alternatives thread

In a thread about a Hetzner object-storage outage, a commenter recommends Filebase's object storage as a replacement S3 API ('For those who are looking for a new S3 API, try Filebase'). Retrieved via pullpush.io; Reddit 403s this host.

source dated 2026-08-26 · verified by us 2026-09-24 · HTTP 403 · known site, treat as indicative
reddit.com/r/ipfs neutral

IPFS people I need your help (Storacha shutdown thread)

Users needing to migrate pinned NFT data after the Storacha shutdown are pointed to Filebase IPFS pinning and to self-hosting; illustrates Filebase's role as a migration destination when a competitor exits. Retrieved via pullpush.io; Reddit 403s this host.

source dated 2026-06-12 · verified by us 2026-09-24 · HTTP 403 · known site, treat as indicative
reddit.com/r/ipfs mixed

Any good alternatives to Pinata.Cloud?

Community alternatives thread in which multiple users recommend Filebase for value and fast servers when comparing against Pinata's $20/month; others suggest self-hosting or Fleek/Crust. Retrieved via pullpush.io; Reddit 403s this host.

source dated 2023-07-28 · verified by us 2026-09-24 · HTTP 403 · known site, treat as indicative
reddit.com

Community discussion

Community discussion was checked for complaints and feedback on our check date.

source dated n.d. · verified by us 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200 · known site, treat as indicative

// Who is behind Filebase?

Cloud mining ownership is often deliberately opaque. This is what we could verify - with sources. Confidence: high (checked 2026-09-24).

OperatorFilebase
Legal entityFilebase, Inc.
Registered inUnited States

Other sites run by the same operator/network:

  • Filebase
  • Filebase Object Storage
  • Filebase IPFS Pinning
  • Filebase Sites
  • Filebase IPNS

Filebase, Inc. is a US company; its Terms of Service place arbitration in New Castle County, Delaware and choose Delaware law. Founded 2019 and backed by Multicoin Capital, Version One Ventures and Protocol Labs. No street address or company registration number is published. It started as an IPFS pinning / IPFS-Filecoin onramp and now sells S3-compatible object storage; the Filecoin deals it was once known for are no longer advertised anywhere on the fetched pages (checked 2026-09-24).

// AI fact summary - everything we know, compressed

Generated by Qwen3 on 2026-09-28 from our fact database plus the 15 linked sources above. It summarizes - it does not add facts. Check anything that matters against the linked sources.

Bottom line: Filebase is an active S3-compatible object storage and IPFS pinning service with a free tier and genuinely free object egress. It’s priced at $15/TB/month with linear scaling, targeting developers who want low-cost, content-addressed storage. No KYC is required, but the company disclaims responsibility for its underlying storage infrastructure.

The coverage truth: It does not unblock geo-restricted streaming or TV services - this is not a Smart DNS or VPN product. It provides storage and pinning infrastructure for developers, with use cases in web3, static sites (Filebase Sites), and S3-compatible applications.

Setup reality: Access is via S3 API, AWS CLI, SDKs, or IPFS HTTP API; no consumer apps or router setup. Users generate scoped access keys and use the endpoint s3.filebase.io. No IP registration or device limits are documented.

What reviewers say vs what users say: Operator claims 99% uptime and high performance, but no third-party uptime tracking or SLA is published. Reddit users recommend it as a cost-effective Pinata alternative or migration path from failed services like Storacha, though some prefer self-hosting or competitors like Fleek.

Who runs it: Filebase, Inc., a U.S. company founded in 2019 and backed by Multicoin Capital, Version One Ventures, and Protocol Labs. It operates all brands under the Filebase name and manages its bare-metal infrastructure, though storage relies on third-party nodes it does not control.

// Sources & how this review was built

Every external source used on this page, with the date we fetched it. Methodology: how we verify. Sources disappear or change - if a link is dead, tell us via contact.

  1. [1] operator filebase.com - Filebase official site accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Filebase was live and serving content on our verification date.”

  2. [2] operator docs.filebase.com - Filebase documentation accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Documentation was accessible and reviewed for product details on our check date.”

  3. [3] operator filebase.com - Filebase pricing or product page accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Pricing information was available on the provider product page.”

  4. [4] community www.reddit.com - Community discussion accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Community discussion was checked for complaints and feedback on our check date.”

  5. [5] operator filebase.com - Filebase terms of service accessed 2026-10-02 · HTTP 200

    “Terms of service were accessible and reviewed for key provisions.”

Initial database sources (pre meta-review):

// Rate Filebase

Community score: no ratings yet

One rating per user and provider. Smoothed display (statistical prior) prevents single-vote manipulation.

// User comments (0)

No comments yet - be the first. Posting runs a short proof-of-work in your browser (anti-spam), no account needed.