Wattum vs Compass Mining: which should you pick in 2026?

Head-to-head on the facts that decide the purchase: real prices in the provider's own unit, minimum, KYC, proof, payment and terms - every number sourced in the linked reviews.

Short answer: Compass Mining wins overall (4.6/10 vs 4.2/10). Wattum is the better pick if you care most about ease of use. Facts checked 2026-10-02.

Wattum Compass Mining
Overall score (0-10)4.24.6
VerticalASIC hostingASIC hosting
TypeASIC hosting / colocationASIC hosting / colocation
Price from$15unknown
Minimumunknownunknown
KYCnot documentedrequired
Proofnone publishedpartial
PaymentfiatBTC · fiat
Contract termunknown1095 days
Maintenance / feeNot published (hosting is quote-based)unknown
OperatorWattumCompass Mining Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware)
Facts checked2026-09-242026-10-02

// Score breakdown

Compass Mining leads on reliability (+1), transparency (+1.5).

why 4.2/10?

Economics 20% 5
Reliability 20% 3.5
Transparency 18% 4
Track record 15% 4
Contract terms 13% 3
Ease of use 9% 6
Support 5% 4.5

why 4.6/10?

Economics 20% 5
Reliability 20% 4.5
Transparency 18% 5.5
Track record 15% 4
Contract terms 13% 3
Ease of use 9% 5.5
Support 5% 5

// Wattum at a glance

Wattum is still operating with real inventory, but the combination of hidden hosting pricing, an all-sales-final policy and years of credible customer complaints of non-performance makes it a watch-list operator rather than a safe host.

watch

++ What works

  • Live, verifiable Shopify store with 24 in-stock products and published hardware prices
  • Named legal entity, Miami HQ address and phone number
  • Long operating history (self-reported since 2017) with several US facility expansions
  • Sells the full stack: ASICs, containers, transformers, hosting, build-outs and B2B brokerage

-- What to watch

  • Multiple independent 2022-2023 reports of non-performance, seized miners, no communication and a planned lawsuit
  • A 2025-08 first-hand community warning: 'Do not do not do not host with wattum'
  • All sales final, no returns; hosting prices and contract terms are not published
  • Uptime/SLA figures are self-reported with no status page or audit
  • Old domain wattum.com is dead, which has caused some lists to misreport the company as offline

Full Wattum review →

// Compass Mining at a glance

A large hosted-mining platform with real contracts and a named entity, but a 2022 counterparty crisis, unaudited capacity claims, a security interest over your hardware and a rigid 3-year default term make it a watch, not a recommendation.

watch

++ What works

  • Named Delaware entity with downloadable hosting and refund agreements
  • Full-service model: hardware sourcing, hosting, marketplace, repairs, upgrades
  • Marketplace gives a secondary exit path for hardware
  • Accepts card, ACH, wire and cryptocurrency for hosting fees
  • Facility status page and 24/7 support claim

-- What to watch

  • Default hosting term is 3 years, auto-renewing, with a termination fee equal to remaining fees
  • Compass takes a first-priority security interest/UCC lien over customer hardware
  • All hardware sales are final with no refunds
  • 2022: facility partner termination, CEO/CFO resignation, 15% layoffs, stranded Russia machines
  • Capacity and uptime figures are unaudited operator claims; no published $/kWh

Full Compass Mining review →

// FAQ

Which is cheaper, Wattum or Compass Mining?

Wattum publishes a price (from $15); Compass Mining does not publish a comparable figure - and unknown is not free. Compare only the same unit before concluding anything.

Which is more verifiable, Wattum or Compass Mining?

Compass Mining publishes the stronger proof signal; Wattum relies more on operator claims.

Which needs less KYC, Wattum or Compass Mining?

At least one provider does not document its KYC policy - treat it as unknown, not as "no KYC".

Which has the longer track record?

Wattum has the longer track record (since 2017).

Scores and facts: meta-reviews with dated sources - Wattum · Compass Mining. Method: how we verify. More: all providers compared.