# bestcloudmining

> Independent comparison of cloud mining, hashrate markets, ASIC hosting, GPU/AI compute, decentralized storage, web3 naming and staking. No third-party trackers, no accounts. Reviews are fact-based, AI-assisted and updated regularly.

Top providers (score /10):
- [Backblaze B2 (legacy cloud benchmark)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/backblaze-b2/): 8.6 (storage, KYC required) - The best-value centralised object store in this set - cheap, S3-compatible, no minimums and free egress up to 3x stored volume - with the recent $6.95 price and the multi-petabyte Overdrive commitment as the only caveats.
- [Lido (liquid staking)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/lido/): 8.1 (staking, KYC none, provable) - The most liquid and battle-tested way to stake ETH with a transparent 10% rewards fee and a genuinely candid risk disclosure, but it is a DAO-governed protocol with smart-contract, slashing, asynchronous-withdrawal and market-dominance risks rather than a company you can hold to a contract.
- [Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage (legacy cloud benchmark)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/wasabi/): 8 (storage, KYC required) - A credible S3 replacement with genuinely no egress or API fees and a real 99.9% SLA, held back by the 90-day minimum retention, the 1 TB floor and a fair-use egress ceiling that rules it out as a high-egress origin.
- [Ethereum Name Service (ENS)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/ens/): 7.9 (naming, KYC none, provable) - The safest and only mainstream onchain naming system: NFT ownership, deep wallet/browser resolution and full governance disclosure, but it charges annual rent and short names renew at $160-$640 per year.
- [Stacks BNS (.btc names)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/stacks-bns/): 7.9 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A genuinely cheap, Bitcoin-anchored naming system (flat 2 STX burn for ~5 years) with on-chain verifiable rules, but no operating entity, a burn model you can never recover, and a ~5-year expiry rather than true permanence.
- [Braiins (Braiins Pool / Braiins Hashpower / Braiins OS)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/braiins/): 7.8 (hashrate, KYC none) - A credible, well-documented mining stack with a transparent Beta hashrate marketplace and low fees, but the marketplace lacks long-term proof, is non-custodial, and carries harsh frozen-funds and lock-in fine print.
- [Voltage Park](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/voltage-park/): 7.8 (compute, KYC unknown) - One of the cheapest credible H100 sources with a named Delaware entity and real compliance certifications, but it is no longer standalone (rebranding to Lightning AI), all reliability numbers are self-reported, and the contract is non-refundable with Delaware arbitration.
- [Chainstack](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/chainstack/): 7.7 (rpc, KYC unknown) - A transparent, well-established Singapore-run RPC provider with named entity, certifications and published pricing, but the uptime SLA is Enterprise-only and independent tests report a latency gap versus marketing claims.
- [QuickNode](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/quicknode/): 7.7 (rpc, KYC unknown) - A well-established, transparent US RPC vendor with a real free tier and published prices, but method-weighted credits make cross-vendor cost comparison hard and the terms are buyer-hostile on refunds and liability.
- [Rocket Pool](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/rocket-pool/): 7.7 (staking, KYC none, provable) - A genuinely decentralised liquid-staking protocol with open, on-chain parameters and permissionless node operators, but rETH holders pay a ~14% commission (vs Lido's 10%), most contracts are DAO-upgradeable, and exits depend on deposit-pool liquidity.
- [Basenames (Base)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/basenames/): 7.5 (naming, KYC none, provable) - The cheapest mainstream ENS-family identity layer, backed by Coinbase's interface and Base's ENS stack, but names are annual rents with wallet-dependent resolution and Coinbase explicitly disclaims the protocol.
- [F2Pool](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/f2pool/): 7.5 (hashrate, KYC none) - A long-standing, well-disclosed mining pool with competitive fees and a named BVI entity, but it is pool-only and sells no hashrate, so it is not a hashrate/hosting supplier.
- [Salad / SaladCloud](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/salad/): 7.5 (compute, KYC none) - The most price-transparent provider of this set with published per-second rates, live availability and measured earn statistics from a clearly identified US company, but only consumer RTX-class GPUs are offered and workloads must tolerate preemption, with fiat-only buying.
- [AWS S3 (legacy cloud benchmark)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/aws-s3/): 7.4 (storage, KYC required) - The most expensive but most reliable and best-documented object store here; a benchmark rather than a value pick, and its egress fees are exactly why buyers consider B2, Wasabi or decentralised storage.
- [Alchemy](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/alchemy/): 7.3 (rpc, KYC unknown) - Alchemy is a well-established, well-documented multi-chain RPC provider with a real free tier and published usage pricing, but it is card/invoice-only (no crypto), non-refundable, and the standard SLA is 99.9% while its recent status history shows a cluster of regional incidents.
- [Filecoin](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/filecoin/): 7.3 (storage, KYC none, provable) - The most credible decentralised storage market, and FOC now publishes a genuinely transparent ~$5/TiB/mo managed price with on-chain possession proofs, but raw deal pricing stays opaque and durability is per-deal rather than protocol-wide.
- [Lambda (Lambda Labs)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/lambda/): 7.3 (compute, KYC unknown) - An established, well-run GPU cloud with clear per-minute billing, no ingress/egress fees and a live status page, but it is fiat-only and non-refundable, frequently short on the cheapest GPUs, and its Inference API is being wound down.
- [Sia](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/sia/): 7.3 (storage, KYC none, provable) - One of the cheapest decentralised options with real on-chain storage proofs and a free 50 GB on-ramp, but the network is small, redundancy/renewal is the renter's job (or a hosted markup), and there is no durability SLA.
- [Akash Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/akash-network/): 7.2 (compute, KYC optional) - Best-documented and most transparent of the six for raw container compute, with a live price API and a no-lock-in per-block market, but no provider SLA and no hardware proof-of-compute.
- [Allnodes](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/allnodes/): 7.2 (staking, KYC optional) - A long-running, genuinely non-custodial staking operator with the clearest ETH commission in the category, but the no-refund policy and severe negative-balance reward-confiscation clauses are significant buyer risks.
- [Aptos Names](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/aptos-names/): 7.2 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A wallet-native .apt identity layer run directly by Aptos Labs with cheap long names but premium short names, annual-only registration and an explicit operator right to revoke names.
- [NiceHash](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/nicehash/): 7.2 (hashrate, KYC required) - A real, transparent order-book hashrate marketplace run by a named Swiss entity, but you pay a small premium over spot, buy non-audited seller hashrate, and KYC is now mandatory.
- [Sui Name Service (SuiNS)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/suins/): 7.2 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A well-integrated Sui naming primitive with DAO governance and transparent on-chain pricing, but names are 1-year non-refundable subscriptions priced in a USD base from $10 (5+ chars) to $500 (3 chars).
- [dRPC](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/drpc/): 7.2 (rpc, KYC unknown) - One of the cheapest and clearest RPC price models in the set ($6 per 1M requests, flat CU, free tier) with card payment as the norm, but the entity is hidden behind a Cayman address and billing is prepaid non-refundable.
- [Chorus One](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/chorus-one/): 7.1 (staking, KYC required) - A credible eight-year institutional staking operator with a named Swiss entity and a clear 5% OPUS ETH fee, but enterprise commissions are unpublished and the February 2026 Bitwise acquisition changed the counterparty behind the brand.
- [Infura](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/infura/): 7.1 (rpc, KYC unknown) - A mature, easy-to-adopt multi-chain RPC with competitive published tiers and the MetaMask default channel, but priced in vendor-specific credits, gated IPFS, no published SLA below Enterprise and a US arbitration contract.
- [Sazmining](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/sazmining/): 7.1 (hosting, KYC required, provable) - The clearest ownership model in the category: a serial-numbered rig you own, power passed through at cost, a 15% fee taken only on coins actually mined, and payouts that land directly in your wallet.
- [Storj](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/storj/): 7.1 (storage, KYC none) - The easiest and most honestly priced S3-compatible decentralised storage here, but its operator filed Chapter 11 in July 2026 after the Inveniam acquisition - strong product, material corporate-continuity risk.
- [Together AI](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/together-ai/): 7.1 (compute, KYC unknown) - A polished, enterprise-grade open-model inference and GPU-cluster provider with transparent published per-token and per-GPU rates, but it is centralized, card/ACH-only with no crypto path, fully prepaid and non-refundable, and offers no compute proof.
- [Dappnode](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/dappnode/): 7 (staking, KYC none, provable) - A credible, named Spanish vendor for genuinely self-custodial staking, but you are buying hardware and taking on all node operations - the rewards are only as reliable as your own box and its cooling.
- [Everstake](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/everstake/): 7 (staking, KYC unknown) - A large, long-running non-custodial staking operator with unusually clear per-network commissions, tempered by an inconsistent legal-entity identity, no slashing coverage and a liability cap of six months of fees.
- [Runpod](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/runpod/): 7 (compute, KYC optional) - A large, mature, fiat-first GPU cloud with transparent per-second published pricing and strong developer tooling, but its cheapest Community Cloud tier is genuinely unreliable (documented pod evictions) and crypto payment carries a mandatory KYC step.
- [SimpleMining (SimpleMining OS)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/simplemining/): 7 (hosting, KYC unknown) - SimpleMining is a cheap, long-running GPU mining OS with a brand-new GPU cloud; it is not an ASIC hosting provider and should not be listed as one.
- [Prime Intellect](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/prime-intellect/): 6.9 (compute, KYC unknown) - A transparent, well-regarded US GPU marketplace and RL-training platform with competitive observed rates and open-source tooling, but with no SLA, no compute attestation and GPU prices behind a login gate.
- [Tezos Domains](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/tezos-domains/): 6.9 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A cheap, audited, DAO-governed naming system with a real NGO legal wrapper, but limited resolution outside Tezos wallets and dated legal terms for a product whose governance now runs through the TED token.
- [Unstoppable Domains](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/unstoppable-domains/): 6.9 (naming, KYC none) - The best one-time-ownership deal in naming (pay once, no renewal) with a real ICANN registrar behind it, but browser-native resolution has effectively been abandoned (extension pulled from Chrome/Firefox) and web3 registration prices are hidden until checkout.
- [Vast.ai](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/vast-ai/): 6.9 (compute, KYC none) - The most transparent and cheapest raw-GPU marketplace of the six, run by a real Delaware/California company with no token, but host reliability is genuinely variable (documented mid-job restarts) and storage/bandwidth charges are easy to underestimate.
- [Walrus (Mysten Labs)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/walrus/): 6.9 (storage, KYC none, provable) - The most transparent decentralized storage product reviewed - explicit USD pricing and verifiable availability - but billing on ~4.5x encoded size plus 64 MB per-blob metadata makes raw-byte and small-file storage much dearer than the headline rate, and Walrus has no encryption, no region control and no public mainnet upload path.
- [Fil One (successor to Storacha / web3.storage)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/fil-one/): 6.8 (storage, KYC none) - The cheapest transparent Filecoin onramp on the list and unusually honest about its gaps, but it is a brand-new entity built on the team that just shut Storacha down, and encryption keys sit with the regional operator rather than the customer.
- [Filebase](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/filebase/): 6.8 (storage, KYC none) - A mature, well-backed S3-compatible store with genuinely free object egress and a real free tier, but the 'decentralized' pitch is now mostly IPFS pinning on Filebase-controlled infrastructure, Filecoin deals are no longer advertised, and no durability nines or standard SLA are published.
- [Namecoin](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/namecoin/): 6.8 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A genuinely decentralised, extremely cheap and censorship-resistant registry for .bit names with no company and no recurring fee, but it demands technical setup (wallet, manual name ops, ncdns/TLS), names expire without renewal, and its security and liquidity depend on the Bitcoin ecosystem and thin NMC markets.
- [Nym](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/nym/): 6.8 (bandwidth, KYC none) - A genuinely different, well-documented privacy VPN with a cheap annual price and a real mixnet, but you pay for metadata privacy in latency and throughput, so it is best for sensitive traffic rather than as an everyday high-speed VPN.
- [Render Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/render-network/): 6.8 (compute, KYC unknown) - A long-lived, credible render/generative-media marketplace with a real foundation, but opaque job-based pricing, no hardware attestation and a supply side that explicitly guarantees no work.
- [Venice AI](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/venice-ai/): 6.8 (compute, KYC none) - A genuine privacy-first inference service (not GPU rental) with documented TEE/E2EE modes and real crypto payment via USDC/x402 and DIEM, but its legal entity is thinly disclosed and reliability signals are mixed rather than proven.
- [BNB Greenfield](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/bnb-greenfield/): 6.7 (storage, KYC none) - A real, working BNB Chain storage network with transparent on-chain pricing (~$0.031/GB/month storage on 2026-09-24) and erasure-coded redundancy, but it is rented - not permanent - storage run by a small set of 8 elected providers, with a 180-day prepay and explicit data-loss risk if the balance runs dry.
- [Chutes (Bittensor subnet)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/chutes/): 6.7 (compute, KYC unknown, provable) - A real, actively used decentralised inference provider run by a named (offshore) company, with transparent per-token pricing, attestable TEE runs, TAO/Stripe payment and a live status page - the clearest example of buying compute inside Bittensor, though capacity has historically been oversubscribed and there is no uptime SLA.
- [P2P.org](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/p2p-org/): 6.7 (staking, KYC optional) - A large institutional staking operator with genuinely published per-network fees, undermined by a USD 100 liability cap, no slashing protection, unresolved operator-entity transparency and reported gaps between advertised and actual Cardano pool fees.
- [Thunder Compute](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/thunder-compute/): 6.7 (compute, KYC unknown) - A cheap, simple A100/H100 cloud with real funding and a clear virtualisation story, but it is young, publishes no legal entity or security certifications, and all reliability figures are self-reported.
- [EMCD](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/emcd/): 6.6 (hashrate, KYC optional) - A genuine, long-running multi-coin mining pool with real named entities and transparent fees, but it is a pool (you supply the ASICs), not a cloud-mining seller, and its ToS lets the operator suspend accounts and absorb unclaimed balances.
- [Helium IoT](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/helium-iot/): 6.6 (bandwidth, KYC none) - Helium IoT is a large, transparently documented and on-chain-verified LoRaWAN network with cheap USD-pegged data pricing, but it is primarily a supply-side hardware network whose hotspot operators often earn very little, and there is no coverage SLA.
- [Hyperbolic](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/hyperbolic/): 6.6 (compute, KYC optional) - A well-run, self-serve US GPU cloud with transparent hourly pricing and an OpenAI-compatible API, but it is centralized (curated suppliers only), has no hardware proof, and its on-demand H100/H200 rates rose between July and September 2026.
- [Luxor Technology (Hashrate Derivatives + Hashrate Index)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/luxor/): 6.6 (hashrate, KYC required) - The most institutional operator in this set, with a public index and regulated futures listing, but it is a KYC/ISDA OTC desk for verified counterparties, not a retail hashrate shop, and its forward book is not publicly auditable.
- [Pocket Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/pocket-network/): 6.6 (rpc, KYC none) - Very cheap, genuinely decentralised multi-chain RPC with a free keyless lane and a live Foundation, but the commercial team's wind-down, the Shannon migration and a $100 liability cap make it a bet on an evolving protocol rather than a conventional vendor.
- [ar.io (AR.IO Network)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/ar-io/): 6.6 (storage, KYC none, provable) - A credible, well-documented way to make Arweave data reachable and to own permanent names, with a real Dutch foundation behind it - but it is an access/naming layer (not storage), gateway economics need a 20,000 ARIO stake, and the AO->Solana migration is a maturity risk.
- [AntPool](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/antpool/): 6.5 (hashrate, KYC optional) - A long-established pool that genuinely offers cloud hashrate and hosted mining, but its cloud terms are buyer-hostile (non-refundable, suspension still burns the term, operator-measured 95% SLA) and its English disclosure of pricing and entity is thin.
- [Bitmain (hashrate products)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/bitmain-hashrate/): 6.5 (hashrate, KYC required) - Bitmain is the dominant ASIC maker and runs a real turnkey hosting arm, but there is no verifiable standalone 'Bitmain Hashrate' marketplace and the historic HashNest cloud product is dead.
- [Figment](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/figment/): 6.5 (staking, KYC unknown) - A credible, large non-custodial institutional staker with strong client names and a named Canadian entity, but it publishes no commission, caps liability at $100 and disclaims slashing losses, so retail buyers cannot price or fully de-risk it without a sales conversation.
- [Irys](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/irys/): 6.5 (storage, KYC none, provable) - A credible, well-documented 'pay once, store for the term you choose' datachain with a named UK operator, but permanence is still an endowment bet on a very young L1, permanent storage costs ~$2.4/GB one-off in the documented model, and the 2026 chain migration forces existing Arweave integrators to move by 1 November 2026.
- [ArDrive](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/ardrive/): 6.4 (storage, KYC none) - The most polished Arweave onramp and a fair pick for small permanent artifacts, but at ~$89/GiB one-time it is an expensive reseller of an endowment bet whose 'forever' is economic, not guaranteed.
- [Arweave](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/arweave/): 6.4 (storage, KYC none, provable) - Only the right tool for small, high-value, permanently-public artifacts: the one-off fee is AR-denominated and volatile (~13.33 AR/GiB on 2026-09-24) and 'permanent' is an economic endowment bet, not a durability SLA.
- [Luganodes](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/luganodes/): 6.4 (staking, KYC required) - A fast-growing institutional staking operator with strong security-certification and insurance claims, held back by a Cayman entity behind 'Swiss-operated' branding, a vague jurisdiction clause and an unpublished staking commission.
- [SPACE ID](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/space-id/): 6.4 (naming, KYC none) - A useful one-stop aggregator for .bnb/.arb/.eth and other web3 names with real integrations, but it is a renewal-based rental with no published current pricing, resolution that needs its own SDK/Snap, an undisclosed legal jurisdiction and a boilerplate Terms document.
- [Sentinel (dVPN)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/sentinel/): 6.4 (bandwidth, KYC none) - A real, open-source bandwidth marketplace with unusually cheap no-KYC dVPN access and a fair 80/20 node/staker split, but an unclear current operator entity and a 2025 chain upgrade that broke apps and jailed validators mean you should treat reliability and accountability as works in progress.
- [stakefish](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/stakefish/): 6.4 (staking, KYC none) - A long-running non-custodial staker with a clearly disclosed fee split and on-chain verifiability, but the 50% cut of tip/MEV, a non-refundable BVI arbitration contract and 2025 withdrawal/exit complaints make it a fit for users who value transparency and self-custody over lowest cost.
- [Namebase](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/namebase/): 6.3 (naming, KYC optional) - A relaunched non-custodial Handshake registrar with unusually explicit fees and no buyer-side markup, but ownership rests on third-party TLD operators, the legacy custodial platform is shutting down with a hard 2026-10-01 deadline, and the operator behind the brand is undisclosed.
- [Solana Name Service (SNS / .sol)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/sns/): 6.3 (naming, KYC none) - The established Solana naming protocol, now in a disruptive registry migration with one-time (no-renewal) pricing and broad wallet support, but with an unnamed Panama 'Foundation', a paused/rebuilt registration flow and months of expected resolution breakage.
- [Terra Hashes](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/terra-hashes/): 6.3 (hosting, KYC unknown) - Terra Hosting is a small, young US ASIC host with unusually transparent tiered power pricing and mostly positive community reports, but its facility metrics are self-reported and its contract is unpublished.
- [iExec](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/iexec/): 6.3 (compute, KYC none, provable) - Strongest verifiability and legal clarity of this set (named French SAS, Intel TDX attestation, on-chain PoCo, historical audit), but an enterprise/quotation confidential-compute service with no published pricing and small adoption.
- [Aleph Cloud (Aleph.im)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/aleph-cloud/): 6.2 (compute, KYC none) - A real, long-running decentralised cloud with published hourly prices and TEE confidential VMs, but GPU is secondary, the self-published prices contradict each other, and no legal entity or terms of service is reachable.
- [Ankr](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/ankr/): 6.2 (rpc, KYC none) - An established multi-chain RPC/staking operator with a real free lane and a named US entity, but paid pricing is effectively unpublished to outside verifiers and the credit terms are non-refundable with expiring credits.
- [Helium Mobile](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/helium-mobile/): 6.2 (bandwidth, KYC required) - A cheap US phone plan and a live DePIN network, but 'Helium Mobile' is now an Affiniti Ventures consumer brand on top of a Nova Labs network, offload earnings for Hotspot operators are low and disputed, and HNT mapping rewards ended in 2025.
- [Mysterium Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/mysterium/): 6.2 (bandwidth, KYC none) - A durable residential-bandwidth network where node earnings and consumer VPN sales sit in different entities (Swiss developer, Lithuanian publisher, Panamanian law), so it is best treated as a cheap residential-IP VPN plus a small, demand-limited MYST earning opportunity - not a privacy guarantee.
- [Spheron Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/spheron/): 6.2 (compute, KYC unknown) - A real, competitively priced, self-serve GPU marketplace, but it is a Singapore-based broker of other providers' capacity with non-refundable credits, a $10,000 refund floor, and no SLA of its own.
- [Antpool (cloud mining)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/antpool-cloud/): 6.1 (mining, KYC optional) - A genuine long-established pool selling real prepaid cloud hashrate, but the only live package is sold out, the per-TH unit is undisclosed, and the contract lets AntPool suspend service while still consuming the term.
- [CUDOS](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/cudos/): 6.1 (compute, KYC none) - A live, no-KYC, crypto-payable GPU cloud and per-token LLM inference service (ASI:Cloud), but the CUDOS brand/token is historical after the ASI merger and GPU hourly pricing is login-gated.
- [Gensyn](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/gensyn/): 6.1 (compute, KYC unknown, provable) - A well-documented pivot away from GPU rental: Gensyn is now an OP-Stack L2 for verifiable AI and on-chain information markets powered by $AI, with no per-GPU-hour product to compare and a token down ~81% from its April 2026 high.
- [NFT.Storage](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/nft-storage/): 6.1 (storage, KYC unknown) - A legitimate, still-operating NFT preservation service at a transparent one-time $4.99/GB, but read it as a post-transition product: the free Classic tier is decommissioned and the original company wound down, so long-term reliance rests on the PLFIF endowment and Lighthouse.
- [Pinata](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/pinata/): 6.1 (storage, KYC none) - A long-running, transparent IPFS pinning vendor with a clean US entity and good developer tooling, but it is a single-provider pinning model with no durability SLA, metered bandwidth, and card-only billing.
- [Theta EdgeCloud](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/theta-edgecloud/): 6.1 (compute, KYC unknown) - A long-lived, well-funded hybrid GPU marketplace with genuinely cheap consumer-GPU rates and a real user dashboard, but with weak on-chain linkage of compute spend, a reported Los Angeles fraud/token-manipulation lawsuit, and no hardware proof of compute.
- [ViaBTC](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/viabtc/): 6.1 (hashrate, KYC optional) - A long-running, feature-rich mining pool with transparent fees, but it sells no hashrate, names no company in its own terms (Samoa law) and has a documented 2026 account-lock/funds-access complaint.
- [4EVERLAND](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/4everland/): 6 (storage, KYC unknown) - Cheap, developer-friendly IPFS/Arweave storage and gateways under a named Singapore entity, but read it as a legacy storage onramp inside an AI/RPC pivot, with two-year-old billing docs and a $4EVER token down ~96% from its ATH.
- [Autonomi (formerly Safe Network)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/autonomi/): 6 (storage, KYC none) - A genuinely novel pay-once, immutable, post-quantum storage network with named Swiss/Scottish stewards and a transparent pricing formula, but the 2.0 network is young, the node app is Beta and 'forever' is an economic incentive rather than a guaranteed SLA.
- [Kiln](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/kiln/): 6 (staking, KYC unknown) - A credible institution-grade staking platform with SOC 2 and a clean slashing record, but undisclosed fees, unresolved key-custody questions and the September 2025 incident (one client lost Solana funds; all ETH validators force-exited) make it a choice for buyers who can do full diligence.
- [Nosana](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/nosana/): 6 (compute, KYC unknown) - A genuinely transparent, cheap self-serve marketplace with a live price table and a named Dutch entity, but reachable high-end capacity is effectively nil and the network is still subsidising supply to bootstrap demand.
- [SunnySide Digital](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/sunnyside-digital/): 6 (hosting, KYC unknown) - SunnySide Digital no longer exists as a standalone product; its team and business now live on as Synteq Digital/Synteq HPC, so buyers must evaluate the successor entity, which now sells compute rather than ASIC hosting.
- [Deeper Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/deeper-network/): 5.9 (bandwidth, KYC none) - Deeper sells a genuinely one-time hardware VPN/DPN router with a documented token-mining model and a 14-day return policy, but the value case rests on uncertain DPR earnings, prices are inconsistent between its own pages, and community reports point to hardware and support friction.
- [Lava Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/lava/): 5.9 (rpc, KYC unknown) - A genuine decentralised-RPC product with a free tier and an audit, but its public pricing is explicitly a mockup and its docs contradict the pricing page on chains and limits, so a buyer cannot yet treat the published numbers as firm.
- [Swarm (Ethereum)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/swarm/): 5.9 (storage, KYC none, provable) - A mature, transparently run Swiss non-profit storage-and-distribution network with a real staking-based incentive layer - but you rent expiring postage-stamp space at ~$0.064/GB/month, there is no delete and no permanence, and earning requires a non-refundable 10 xBZZ node stake.
- [Allora](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/allora/): 5.8 (compute, KYC none) - A credible, well-documented decentralised inference network that is easy and free to try, but it is not GPU rental, publishes no per-inference price, and depends on a young, deeply drawn-down ALLO token.
- [Gonka (Gonka.ai)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/gonka/): 5.8 (compute, KYC unknown) - A genuinely live, actively developed and CertiK-audited decentralized-inference network with transparent on-chain pricing, but an opaque legal entity, tiny on-chain activity and token liquidity only via wrapped WGNK on Uniswap.
- [Grass](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/grass/): 5.8 (bandwidth, KYC none) - Grass runs a large two-sided residential-bandwidth network with published tokenomics and a free, pausable app, but the contributor's real-world payout is small and variable, buyer pricing is not public, and the legal entity has shifted from Wynd Labs to a BVI OpCo/Foundation structure.
- [Orchid](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/orchid/): 5.8 (bandwidth, KYC none) - A mature, transparent and honestly-documented decentralised VPN where you pay only for what you use - but the exit node still sees your traffic, there is no public per-GB price, and funding an account adds real complexity (deposits, tickets, variance, 24h cool-off).
- [Staketab](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/staketab/): 5.8 (staking, KYC none) - A long-running, multi-chain non-custodial validator with public APRs and useful explorers, but buying blind on price because neither the commission nor a legal counterparty is published.
- [Fluence](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/fluence/): 5.7 (compute, KYC unknown) - A credible Swiss-DAO compute project with an attractive H200 rate and a real GPU marketplace, but today the renter experience is an Alpha-gated console funded only in USDC via CopperX, with no SLA and no hardware proof.
- [Hivemapper](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/hivemapper/): 5.7 (bandwidth, KYC unknown) - A real mapping network with 37% global road coverage and enterprise demand, but the company now pays contributors in USDC and ended HONEY rewards and its Foundation services agreement, so treat HONEY as speculative and mapping rewards as discretionary and geography-dependent.
- [KuCoin (pool / hashrate products)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/kucoin-hashrate/): 5.7 (hashrate, KYC required) - KuCoin's hashrate offering is genuinely live as KuPool (pool) plus KuMining (cloud mining) with real, top-4 LTC pool hashrate, but both products are under a year old and disclose neither fees nor a product-level legal entity.
- [Stakewolle](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/stakewolle/): 5.7 (staking, KYC none) - A broad-chain non-custodial validator with refreshingly published 2-10% commissions, but the slashing 'insurance' is a 1%-capped self-administered policy, the operator names no company or forum, and the site's own statistics include obviously false market caps.
- [Bitdeer Technologies Group](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/bitdeer/): 5.6 (mining, KYC required) - A large, audited, listed miner whose real but small cloud-hashrate product is dynamically repriced at the company's discretion and was entirely sold out when checked, with payout mechanics and hashrate proof unavailable to buyers.
- [Handshake](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/handshake/): 5.6 (naming, KYC none, provable) - A genuinely decentralised naming layer where names are auctioned and bids burned, but using a name still means running a custom resolver and trusting a thin, migrating registrar ecosystem - ownership without a company to call.
- [Jackal Protocol](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/jackal/): 5.6 (storage, KYC unknown) - A real, working Cosmos storage chain that is now clearly stalled: live and buyable, but 19 months without a blog post, a ~$47k JKL market cap and a development freeze make it a high-risk place to keep data.
- [MiningRigRentals](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/miningrigrentals/): 5.6 (hashrate, KYC optional) - A long-running, usable rig-rental marketplace, but you are exposed to seller counterparty risk and 2026 user reports say disputes are not reliably resolved.
- [SealStorage](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/seal-storage/): 5.6 (storage, KYC unknown) - A credible enterprise Filecoin storage provider with reference research customers (University of Utah, CERN ATLAS) and a simple, competitive $5.99/TB/month list price, but current 2026 pricing/status could not be freshly verified because the live site is Cloudflare-challenged.
- [Abundant Mines](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/abundant-mines/): 5.5 (hosting, KYC unknown) - A small, regionally focused Oregon host with unusually clear flat pricing and included insurance and labour, but every performance claim is self-reported and there is almost no independent verification.
- [Zus (Zus Network)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/zus/): 5.5 (storage, KYC unknown) - A genuinely decentralised zero-knowledge storage network that is still under active development, but with no verifiable price, a flagship consumer app whose domain lapsed in August 2026 and a token down 99.97% from its high, it is a watch-list project rather than a safe place for data you need to retrieve.
- [Freename](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/freename/): 5.4 (naming, KYC none) - A real Swiss ICANN-accredited registrar with competitive Web2 pricing, but its Web3 TLDs are expensive, non-refundable, one-time assets that resolve only through Freename's own DNS tooling - not a substitute for a normal domain.
- [Golem Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/golem/): 5.4 (compute, KYC optional) - The oldest decentralized-compute project still ships and is run by a clearly identified Swiss company, but it is developer-first with GLM-only payments, no public GPU price list, and a GPU provider programme that has stayed in beta since 2022 - useful for builders, not a turnkey GPU rental.
- [MiningStore](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/miningstore/): 5.4 (hosting, KYC unknown) - A real, long-running US Iowa hosting operator with a published (self-advertised) 6.7-7.5c/kWh rate, but unaudited and inconsistent capacity claims plus a self-published review site warrant caution.
- [BitFuFu Inc.](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/bitfufu/): 5.3 (mining, KYC required) - A genuinely large, audited, listed miner, but its retail cloud contracts stay opaque: pricing, terms and per-customer hashrate cannot be verified without an account, and 2026 brought a loss quarter plus a critical unexplained-liability claim.
- [Bittensor](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/bittensor/): 5.3 (compute, KYC none) - The largest decentralized-AI network by token value and genuinely innovative, but it is not a GPU rental marketplace: buyers rent compute indirectly through subnet apps like Chutes, and the real economics are speculative subnet emissions rather than a posted $/GPU-hour.
- [Unmineable](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/unmineable/): 5.3 (mining, KYC none) - A long-running, low-fee conversion proxy for miners who already own hardware, but you sell no hashrate and the anonymous, vaguely-jurisdictioned operator plus recent unanswered support complaints are the main risks.
- [io.net](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/io-net/): 5.3 (compute, KYC unknown) - A broad, well-funded stack with genuine Intel TDX confidential-compute attestation, but it publishes no consumer price table and its quiet, utility-questioned token economy makes cost evaluation impossible without an account.
- [Lighthouse](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/lighthouse/): 5.2 (storage, KYC none) - A candid, well-documented IPFS+Filecoin onramp with an S3 API and useful encryption tooling, but it is an expensive reseller of decentralised storage with no disclosed legal entity, no SLA, and a Terms page that explicitly disclaims 'permanent' storage.
- [Blockware Solutions](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/blockware/): 5.1 (hosting, KYC unknown) - A large, live US hosting/brokerage brand with disclosed $0.078/kWh starting power and Soluna-backed MW growth, but a $50 liability cap, a 2022 fraud lawsuit and recurring facility outages make it a use-with-caution operator, not a safe default.
- [Kryptex](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/kryptex/): 5.1 (hashrate, KYC unknown) - A genuinely useful, long-running desktop miner and pool with transparent fees, undermined by the absence of any disclosed legal entity or jurisdiction and a history of payout/verification complaints.
- [KuMining](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/kumining/): 5.1 (mining, KYC required) - A real, currently operating KuCoin cloud-mining product with unusually observable per-unit fee data, but its returns are unverifiable and its own calculator implies thin or negative margins, so the claimed hashrate remains an operator claim.
- [Morpheus](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/morpheus/): 5.1 (compute, KYC none) - A genuinely decentralized, TEE-verified DeAI inference network with transparent on-chain metrics, but it is early-stage, anonymous, crypto-only and has no published price or legal recourse.
- [NodeShift](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/nodeshift/): 5.1 (compute, KYC unknown) - A funded, legitimate enterprise company that pivoted away from GPU cloud into a governed 'private AI' platform; for a GPU-rental comparison it is no longer a self-serve compute vendor and publishes no verifiable price (old or new).
- [Aethir](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/aethir/): 5 (compute, KYC required) - A large enterprise/gaming GPU network with a real checker/slashing design and mandatory KYC, but opaque enterprise-only pricing and a 2026 community pattern of token-holder anger, a reported Solana bridge/swap problem and its flagship partner apparently refusing to stake.
- [GNS (identity unverified)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/gns/): 5 (naming, KYC unknown) - Cannot be reviewed as a provider: 'GNS' is not tied to a single authoritative naming service, and the previously guessed domains are parked landers.
- [GoMining](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/gomining/): 5 (mining, KYC required) - A real tokenised-mining platform with a better-than-usual exit (own and resell the miner), but it layers token/NFT speculation on top of mining economics and carries a documented 2026 AML funds-retention dispute with no independent hashrate proof.
- [Cudo (CudoMiner)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/cudominer/): 4.9 (mining, KYC unknown) - A once-active GPU-mining software platform with named BVI/UK entities and fair commission pricing, now effectively frozen since 2022 while the parent company moved on to enterprise AI infrastructure.
- [Frontier Mining](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/frontier-mining/): 4.8 (hosting, KYC unknown) - A real, continuously-operating US ASIC/HPC hosting business with named staff and a Plano HQ, but no published pricing, no disclosed legal entity and all capacity/uptime figures self-reported, so verify before committing hardware.
- [Crust Network](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/crust/): 4.7 (storage, KYC unknown) - A genuine, long-running CRU-paid storage market with honest docs but no fixed price, no SLA, engineer-grade onboarding and a token that trades at ~1 cent, so it is cheap in theory and high-uncertainty in practice.
- [POW.RE](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/pow-re/): 4.7 (hashrate, KYC unknown) - A legible, operator-run OTC hashrate desk with real mining history and physical delivery mechanics, but it is young, names no legal entity on its live site, is entirely self-reported, and its disclosed early backer/partner Haru Invest collapsed in 2023.
- [Atoma](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/atoma/): 4.6 (compute, KYC unknown) - A genuinely interesting confidential-compute architecture with no verified token, no pricing and no legal entity - and, as of 2026-09-24, no working public site, dashboard or API, so it cannot presently be evaluated as a provider.
- [Compass Mining](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/compass-mining/): 4.6 (hosting, KYC required) - A large hosted-mining platform with real contracts and a named entity, but a 2022 counterparty crisis, unaudited capacity claims, a security interest over your hardware and a rigid 3-year default term make it a watch, not a recommendation.
- [ECOS (ECOS-M)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/ecos/): 4.6 (mining, KYC required) - A clearly-identified, long-running Armenian operator with published prices and real infrastructure, but its cloud contracts are rigid, up to 60 months long, carry no hashrate proof, and only show returns through projections the buyer controls.
- [Clore.ai](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/clore-ai/): 4.4 (compute, KYC optional) - A genuinely used, cheap P2P GPU marketplace with good docs and live inventory, but it hides behind an unnamed legal entity, overstates its CertiK status, and carries credible withdrawal/support complaints - treat as high-risk and only deposit what you can afford to lose.
- [BTFS (BitTorrent File System)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/btfs/): 4.2 (storage, KYC unknown) - BTFS is no longer a purchasable storage service: its portal now 301-redirects to the unrelated BTTInferGrid AI-compute product and its docs/subdomains are offline, so a storage buyer should look elsewhere and only treat this as an archival record.
- [Wattum](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/wattum/): 4.2 (hosting, KYC unknown) - Wattum is still operating with real inventory, but the combination of hidden hosting pricing, an all-sales-final policy and years of credible customer complaints of non-performance makes it a watch-list operator rather than a safe host.
- [Mawson Infrastructure (rebranded: Big Digital Energy)](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/mawson/): 4.1 (hosting, KYC unknown) - A real, SEC-reporting US infrastructure operator, but substantial-doubt going-concern language, ~$27.5M of overdue debt, heavy litigation and related-party colocation deals make it a watch, not a recommendation.
- [MinerSet](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/minerset/): 4.1 (hosting, KYC unknown)
- [Exabits](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/exabits/): 4 (compute, KYC unknown) - A tokenised-compute project with an aspirational narrative and a JS-only marketing site but no disclosed legal entity, no public pricing, no product documentation and no CoinGecko-listed token - it cannot be verified as a rentable service, so status is verify, not active.
- [Flux](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/flux/): 4 (compute, KYC optional) - A genuinely long-running DePIN cloud with a live GPU marketplace, but its UK operating company entered administration on 2026-09-04, it publishes no verifiable GPU pricing, and FluxEdge deposits are non-refundable and non-withdrawable, so prepaid balances now carry counterparty risk.
- [Hashing24](https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/hashing24/): 3.6 (mining, KYC optional) - An old but opaque contract seller: buyers cannot see a price before signing in, cannot verify hashrate, can have the contract cancelled for being unable to pay daily fees, and face a 0.0007 BTC withdrawal minimum that has drawn public fraud complaints.

Key pages:
- All providers: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/providers/
- Best hubs index: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/best/
- Head-to-head comparisons: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/compare/
- Cloud mining: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/mining/ · GPU compute: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/compute/ · Storage: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/storage/
- Provider finder: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/finder/
- Tools: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/tools/
- Guides: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/guides/
- Hashprice & network stats: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/hashprice/
- GPU price index: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/gpu-prices/
- Scam watch: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/scam-watch/
- Brand checks: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/brand-checks/
- Methodology: https://www.bestcloudmining.net/methodology/